|HOME||FOR AUTHORS||EDITORIAL BOARD||ABOUT WJOMI|
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in patients with vaginal exudates indicating leucorrhoea in Havana, Cuba.
Abilio Ubaldo Rodríguez Pérez1
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is considered a health problem - with human and social impact - because of its high morbidity in the contemporary world. The presence of sexually transmitted diseases, multiple sexual partners and the use of intrauterine devices, are risk factors for the development of this infection, which incidence increases significantly in women of fertile age .
It is defined as a polymicrobial clinical syndrome, which is characterized by abnormal vaginal discharge with disorder of the vaginal ecosystem and displacement of lactobacilli by other microorganisms [2-3]. At present, it’s considered a disease with well established symptoms and signs.
BV represents 60% of all vulvovaginal infections, increasing by 10 to 100 times the concentration of anaerobic pathogens (Bacteroides spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Gardnerella vaginalis and Mobiluncus) and resulting in clinical symptoms . However, it is common to obtain negative results in patients with vaginal discharge, because there are no resources which allow isolation of other microorganisms of interest than those commonly reported.
Discharge with bad odour, itching and irritation are the most common symptoms. The ammonia smell gets stronger as secretions become more alkaline after intercourse or menstruation. Redness and oedema are frequent.
To identify the presence of BV, it is important to know in advance the normal physiology of the vagina, with its microbiota a dynamic ecosystem that can be easily altered. Secretions have a complex composition, including cervical mucus and those that are associated with the vaginal wall. The amount and composition may vary greatly with age and menstrual cycle, excitation and sexual activity, contraceptives, pregnancy and emotional state.
The normal vaginal secretions are odourless, white or clear, viscous, homogeneous or flocculent with agglutinate elements, pH <4.5 and they do not slip during speculum examination. Lactobacilli predominate in the normal vaginal microbiota (up to 10 million / mL of vaginal secretions) but when there are imbalanced concentrations of facultative and anaerobic microorganisms, Gardnerella vaginalis can be isolated in 5-60% of cases, Mobiluncus can be found between 0-5% and Mycoplasma hominis between 15-30% of sexually active healthy women .
However, vaginal microbiota of a patient with BV differs significantly from that of a healthy woman, presenting few lactobacilli, Gardnerella vaginalis in 95% of cases, Mobiluncus in 50-70% and Mycoplasma hominis between 60-75% with the ratio of anaerobic to aerobic microorganisms: 100 to 1000:1. The presence of leukocytes suggests the existence of a concomitant infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia spp. and the microbes need to be cultured. We do not recommend the routine performance of these investigations because 50-60% of women are asymptomatic patients harbouring Gardnerella vaginalis .
To make the diagnosis of BV, it’s necessary to follow Amsel’s clinical criteria, which are based on the presence of at least 3 of the following criteria [1, 4]:
- Homogeneous discharge: it’s often described as a glass of milk poured over the vagina.
- pH over 4.5 (usually 5.0-6.0): The pH is measured with a pH strip or tape, taking care not to touch the cervical secretions, which tend to be alkaline. A vaginal pH below 4.5 excludes the diagnosis of BV.
- Positive amines liberation test (or the whiff test): fishy (amine) smell is produced by reacting vaginal discharge with 10% KOH. No odour occurs in the absence of BV. This test predicts the diagnosis of BV in 94% of patients.
- Presence of clue cells (Figure 1): these are squamous epithelial cells with bacteria on the surface that become dark. Vaginal epithelial cells generally have specific characteristics. A drop of discharge is mixed with a drop of saline solution and the cells can be highlighted by adding methylene blue to the saline solution.
Figure 1. Clue cells, i.e. extended, vaginal epithelial cells which are covered by pathogenic bacteria. Source: Chair of Microbiology, JUMC, Cracow.
[please click on the image to enlarge]
Some authors have shown that the presence of the last two criteria is enough to make the diagnosis of this condition [1, 3].
According to what was previously stated, this study was aimed at making the diagnosis of BV in three hospitals in Havana, confirming its prevalence in patients with vaginal exudates indicating leucorrhoea.
General objective: to determine the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in women who attended the Laboratory of Microbiology of three hospitals of Havana, Cuba between October and December 2018, with vaginal exudates indicating leucorrhoea
This study was a quasi experimental cross- sectional research.
353 vaginal exudates collected towards diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were processed in the Laboratory of Microbiology of three hospitals in Havana, Cuba, from October to December 2018, following Amsel’s clinical criteria.
/or right-click and save as.../
Results with discussion
We can observe in Table 1, that since the implementation of the diagnosis of BV, there is a significant increase in the positivity of these tests (63%) when compared to those made in the same period of 2017 (12%).
Table 1. Vaginal exudate results before and after laboratory diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Laboratories of Microbiology, three OB/GYN hospitals in Havana, Cuba. Samples collected from October - December 2018. Source: Process Record Books.
Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida albicans were the most frequent microorganisms found (Table 2) coinciding with some authors’ finds [1, 4].
Table 2. Distribution of microorganisms found in the vaginal discharge. Laboratories of Microbiology, three OB/GYN hospitals in Havana, Cuba. Samples collected from October - December 2018. Source: Process Record Books.
Table 3 shows the results obtained using the Amsel’s clinical criteria for the diagnosis of BV, the presence of clue cells in the direct examination, the whiff test, and pH ≥5 were the most sensitive and specific tests; overall the prevalence of BV for the whole study was 23%.
Table 3. Diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis. Laboratories of Microbiology, three OB/GYN hospitals in Havana, Cuba. Samples collected from October - December 2018. Source: Process Record Books.
 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. MMWR 2015; 64(RR-3). Access valid 21 January 2019: https://www.cdc.gov/std/spanish/vb/stdfact-bacterial-vaginosis-s.htm
 Martínez MW. Actualización sobre vaginosis bacteriana. Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2013; 39 (4).
 Arnold M, González A, Carbonell T. Diagnóstico de vaginosis bacteriana. Aspectos clínicos y estudios microbiológicos. Rev Mex Patol Clin 2015. Access valid on 21 January 2019: http://www.medigraphic.com
 WebMD. Bacterial Vaginosis. Causes, Symptoms and Treatments. USA 2011. Access valid on 21 January 2019: http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/tc/bacterial-vaginosis-topic-overview
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Acknowledgements: Thanks to staff of the Chair of Microbiology, JUMC in Cracow for the photograph.
1 Provincial Center of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Microbiology, Havana, Cuba
Prof. Abilio Ubaldo Rodríguez Pérez
Provincial Center of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Microbiology
102 Ave, No. 3001, among 31 and 31B Street
Tel. +53 72600717
To cite this article: Rodríguez Pérez AU. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in patients with vaginal exudates indicating leucorrhoea in Havana, Cuba. World J Med Images Videos Cases 2019; 5:e9-13.
Submitted for publication: 21 January 2019
Accepted for publication: 22 February 2019
Published on: 28 February 2019
Our website may require cookies.
Using our internet pages,
you agree for these cookies to be used
according to current legal regulations.
If you do not agree, please do not use our website!
© 2019 WJOMI